Mine was #comment-43955.
It was rejected and doesn't even appear in the moderation queue anymore. Other comments with higher numbers than my comment have since been published.
Here is my rejected comment. No rudeness, just a contrary view:
Strange that there's an improvement in Arctic ice, yet models predict increasing fragility. If anything the Arctic ice loss slowdown should reduce the doominess of models. Usually models conform to reality not the other way around.
Last two years has seen a recovery in volume.
Arctic extent has boomed in the last month:
No evidence these natural changes in weather/climate are influenced by CO2.
Such a shame dissenting views aren't allowed on Robert Scribbler's website. Contrary views are the lifeblood of scientific discussions. An echo-chamber of one's own ideas serves no-one.